Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 24, 2023

Rotables Logic Widget

A Functionality around Split Valuation materials to allow for overall right-sizing Core, Repaired, New, Capital materials from SOH and ROP/MAX = How many of each type is needed, how many are "in rotation" where are they, how many are due back either from the Field or Vendor, when are they expected to be returned

Idea priority Low
Needed By Not sure -- Just thought it was cool
  • Admin
    Dylan Jones
    Reply
    |
    Aug 14, 2023

    Hi David we have had a discussion around this. This a great idea and would bring value to our clients. Currently we have a lot of clients optimising repairables using MRO, albeit to a certain level, To take this further we would need to start customising solutions specific to each client. I will promote this to an epic and tie it in with the other repairable epics so we can work on this as a seperate project when time permits.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 11, 2023

    Hi Dylan - It looks like we are only pulling the Valuation Category = Z ("Split Valuation") this is what we pull for most clients to define their "Rotable" Control Segment - But since we don't have a good solution around Rotables - I have yet to see a client instance where we are separating the different Valuation Types (New, Repaired, Core, etc), even though the "Condition Code" has been a standard column in Primer going back to the early versions OAS. Most US clients combine New and Repaired information together so they show as 1 record so they can see forecast based on total consumption. If we could come up with a "best-practice for Rotables management" - Clients would buy MRO just for that, Rotables is the single largest MRO inventory category by value for most clients, and often the most manually intensive.

  • Admin
    Dylan Jones
    Reply
    |
    Aug 10, 2023

    Hi David, checking in to see if this is possible using the data Barrick has in MRO IO? For us to look at building a solution we would need to have the client data in MRO IO i.e. are the connectors pulling the data that is needed?

  • Admin
    Dylan Jones
    Reply
    |
    Jul 28, 2023

    Understood, where has Barrick got those values in MRO IO currently?

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 28, 2023

    In SAP environments this typically are Valuation Category and Valuation Type fields. I know there is something similar in Maximo environments

  • Admin
    Dylan Jones
    Reply
    |
    Jul 28, 2023

    Hi David, great idea. Can you let us know what fields Barrick is using to hold this information now so we can look at options for moving this forward?