This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
email@example.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Currently not under consideration for General availability. We might revisit and review for if there are critical business challenges.
Guest, sure the other idea is under B2BI-I-1108 the reason that it's not easily identified is because the two ideas are, this one, which is use Sterling Envelopes without the Sterling DocExtract Process and make the process more pure ITX, OR alternatively fix the Sterling DocExtract process so that even if the Sterling mapper isn't likely to support JSON any time soon at least if you are going to support it with ITX support the JSON single root take issue withing DocExtract the way you do XML data, or similarly.
I'm not sure if I have a strong opinion which one wins out ideally both should be options, my biggest concern is a volleyball match of each side throwing the issue at the fence at one another and neither happening. Which sort of started with the prior incident ticket which only got closed because our present ask needed differed enveloping but we don't want that to be something we need to do for everything because that doesn't always make sense and adds delay to more real time processes.
Is the second 'IDEA' is a separate AHA! ? If so, can you provide the number? If not, can you please open one with a bit more detail please?