This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Currently if two nodes are defined NODEA and NODEB in the netmap and NODEA has ALT.NODEDEF=NODEB coded, if NODEA can not sent to its primary IP address coded then the file will be sent to the IP address coded on NODEB. The issue is that the CT statistics record indicates that the node the file was sent to was NODEA not NODEB. This only indication in the CT statistics record indicating that the file was sent to NODEB is the IP address of NODEB that is recorded.
What is your industry? | Consumer Products |
How will this idea be used?
I had opened a SR with IBM regarding this issue and they responded with Connect Direct was working as designed. I'm wanting the correct node name to be recorded in the statistic(s) records so that our internal reporting will be accurate and our support staff will be able to accuratly determine the node to which a file was actually sent. |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Gerry,
It is part of the v6.1.0 base. Let us know if you have any other questions.
Thanks,
Chris Sanders
Connect:Direct Offering Manager
Chris what is the PTF number which implements this enhancement or is part of the 6.1 base code?
Thanks,
Gerry Boynton
Gerry,
No problem at all. Due to the changes that needed to be made we only intend to provide this enhancement in v6.1 onward so back porting likely isn't an option. That being said, we made some other significant improvements in the v6.1.0 release that might be interesting. I've included a link to the announcement that covers many of them below as they might make the decision to upgrade easier.
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=AN&subtype=CA&htmlfid=897/ENUS220-203&appname=lenovous&language=en
Thanks,
Chris Sanders
Connect:Direct Offering Manager
Chris,
Thanks so much for following through with this RFE as I hope it will help others out other than myself. I guess I'll need to get to 6.1 (currently at 6.0) to be able to see this enhancement. Is there a APAR targeted for 6.0 at all or must I upgrade to 6.1?
Thank you again
Gerry Boynton
Thank you for your patience as we worked on this request. I'm pleased to announce that we have delivered this enhancement with the C:D v6.1.0 release which became generally available on 06/05/20. Please consider upgrading to start gaining the benefits of this and other enhancements that we've made in the latest release.
Sincerely,
Chris Sanders
Connect:Direct Offering Manager
This feature is now available in Connect Direct for z/OS 6.1.
Thank you for opening this enhancement request with IBM. I have reviewed it with my team and we believe that it would be valuable to enhance the CT record to display the updated nodename in this instance. I have accepted this as an uncommitted candidate and we will look to add it to our roadmap moving forward.
Sincerely,
Chris Sanders
Connect:Direct Offering Manager