Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

Usability

Showing 37

Allow under receiving at qty level - Currently it shorts the entire container

Store engagement currently allows over receiving once you receive a container. I can over receive any quantity. But there is no provision to under receive. If I do record damage on a container, it records the entire container as damaged. If a case...
15 days ago in Store Engagement / Usability 0 Submitted

Transfers order created for Store to DC in Store UI should be stamping sequential Prime Line Number

While creating a transfer order for Store to a DC using Store Engagement UI, we have observed that the prime line numbers at the order line are getting stamped as 10,60 instead of the usual 1 and 2. This causes issue while sending order release de...
28 days ago in Store Engagement / Usability 0 Under review

Apply / Resolve Holds feature missing in Store engagement

Costco is migrating their business from RCP SOM to Store Engagement. We are missing Apply / Resolve hold feature for an order - which is widely used by store associate today in case they want to enforce / bypass and proceed with the order processi...
about 2 months ago in Store Engagement / Usability 1 Functionality already exists

Supervisor Approval flow missing in Store engagement

At Costco, we have a usecase to support Supervisor approval workflow to override price in case the current user doesn't have relevant permissions. This feature is missing in Store engagement per current documention
2 months ago in Store Engagement / Usability 1 Under review

Ability to copy order in Store engagement

Fot Costco, we have a use case where existing member order is looked up and copied over to create a new order. As a Store associate, I should be able to capture the order with copy order functionality which doesn't seem to exist today.
2 months ago in Store Engagement / Usability 4 Functionality already exists

Store engagement UI: Streamline Reclassification of inventory across product classes

As a store operations associate I need the ability to quickly move inventory from one class to another. Currently IBM store requires an inventory adjustment out of the class with manual entry of the correct reason code and then and inventory adjus...
3 months ago in Store Engagement / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to add custom resource permissions for Store Engagement App

Application Manager currently restricts ability to add custom resource permissions for IBM Store Engagement application. This idea would provide ability to manage permissions for custom UI components in IBM Store Engagement application.
4 months ago in Store Engagement / Usability 1 Is a defect

Store UI: Requirement to capture user making inventory adjustments/cycle count approvals

In Store UI, when we perform inventory adjustments, user info who did the adjustment is not stored/displayed in store UI nor it is passed in the webhook inventory adjustment subscription. Impact: User will not be able to backtrack who performed in...
5 months ago in Store Engagement / Usability 0 Future consideration

Move summary screens does not have the product details move post cancellation

Replication steps:1) Create a new Adhoc move with one serial and non serial SKUs.2) Complete the Pick for both the SKUs.3) Now the move will be In-Progress .4) Cancel the move using the below API call.<Request HTTPMethod="POST" URL="https://sto...
6 months ago in Store Engagement / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Ability for store associates to execute the adhoc cycle count without any explicit assignment

If we assign Adhoc Cycle count task link access to store associates, he is able to create a adhoc cycle count task, but he is not able to complete the task without manager assign the adhoc cycle count task created by him. we need an ability by ass...
7 months ago in Store Engagement / Usability 8 Future consideration