Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Created by Guest
Created on May 12, 2026

Forcing Authorization Code over Client Credentials in an integration connector breaks fundamental integration design

The current behavior of the Salesforce Marketing Cloud native connector reflects a serious architectural misalignment that is difficult to justify in any modern integration platform.

This is not about missing a feature. This is about breaking a fundamental expectation of how backend integrations are supposed to work.

Core issue

The connector effectively enforces Authorization Code flow (user-to-server) while Client Credentials (server-to-server) is not properly supported.

At the same time, the UI exposes client_credentials, which creates the false impression that this flow is supported. Exposing a standard OAuth2 parameter such as client_credentials in the UI without providing the necessary behavior to support it in practice results in misleading capabilities and incorrect architectural assumptions.

Why this is a critical design problem

This is not a matter of opinion:

  • Server-to-server integrations are the baseline use case for platforms like webMethods.
  • Client Credentials is the standard OAuth2 flow for this scenario.
  • Authorization Code is explicitly designed for user interaction and consent.

Requiring a user-centric flow in a headless, backend integration context is not just inconvenient, it is architecturally incorrect.

What this breaks in practice

This design choice directly impacts real-world systems:

  • Breaks stateless authentication models.
  • Forces handling of refresh tokens where they should not exist.
  • Introduces unnecessary state management and failure points.
  • Violates common security policies (no user context, no interactive flows).
  • Makes the connector unsuitable for automation-heavy environments.

In short, this prevents building clean, robust, and compliant integrations.

The most concerning aspect

This is currently being treated as a feature request. It is not.

Calling this a feature request implies that:

  • Supporting server-to-server authentication is optional.
  • Aligning with industry-standard OAuth2 usage is optional.

Neither is true.

This is baseline functionality. Without it, the connector does not meet the minimum expectations of an integration tool.

Expected behavior

At minimum:

  • Full, reliable support for Client Credentials (grant_type=client_credentials).
  • Automatic token acquisition and renewal without user interaction.
  • True headless operation.
  • Alignment with Salesforce Marketing Cloud’s official server-to-server model.

Final statement

If an integration platform cannot correctly support the primary authentication pattern used in backend integrations, then the issue is not a missing enhancement, it is a capability gap that directly limits the viability of the product in real-world architectures.

Idea priority Urgent
Needed By Yesterday (Let's go already!)