This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updateson them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Current requirement is AD team will have multiple groups created and have them added to memberof AD attribute. So, there is no static limit on number group that a user is part of. IBM PEM current configuration cannot accommodate this use case.
Below mentioned use case requires appropriate query with | (or) condition with & (and) to filter among multiple user roles specific to the application. Had discussion with IBM SEAS team through IBM support ticket.
But L3 team has asked us to submit an enhancement request as this is not accomplished as part of the current application capability. Sample output on Roche specific requirement:<name>prefferedLanguage</name> <value>US</value></property><property><name>role-1</name><value>CN=xxxx-xx,OU=xx,OU=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=com</value></property><property><name>role-10</name><value>CN=xx11,OU=xx,OU=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=com</value></property><property><name>role-11</name><value>CN=xx22,OU=xx,OU=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=com</value></property><property><name>role-12</name><value>CN=xx33,OU=xx,OU=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=com</value></property>
We would require capability to add | condition in the LDAP filter query which would allow us to compare multiple groups and also to return only the groups that are relevant to the query.
What is your industry?
How will this idea be used?
As the customer is moving to the complete SEAS based SSO implementation for the complete MFT implementation. This limitation is becoming a roadblock in the process migration to meet the deadline.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.