IBM Sterling Ideas

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

IBM is transforming its request for enhancement (RFE) process. The purpose of the transformation is to provide a more consistent experience for you to submit requests and to enable IBM product owners to respond to your requests more quickly. For more information click here.

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
1. Post an idea
2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you
3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notifications on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

BPN Rules levels with "Default with condition / Last preference with condition" option

We know the Default option in the BPN ST rules has the last preference when conditions are not matched. If we can have an extra option "Default with the condition" which works similarly to the "Default" option but it checks the condition. If still, it doesn't satisfy, then it goes to the Default rule if any.

  • Guest
  • Sep 4 2021
  • Not under consideration
What is your industry? Other
How will this idea be used?

By this we can create some rule more robust where there are no more options to use.

For example:
The Partner sends 3 types of files XML, CSV, & FLAT files via AS2 [AS2 Sender/ReceiverID conditions will be mandatory], where XML are send with .xml , CSV's are with .csv extension. However, the FLAT files are sent with no extension.


Now, to separate these files we need to use typing maps and separate the XML, CSV & Flat.


On the other hand, if I create a rule with file name ends with the condition it works work for XML and EDI but for Flat files, if we may end with a default rule then it will affect all the BPN_AS2_Receive_Rules.


Instead, if we have a "Default with condition" option I can enable it and validate the AS2 sender ID and Receiver ID condition as one step befroe the last preference [default rule].


Note: This is Just an example, But while implementing we see similar issues many more.

We can say this is because of the limited options that we have on the current rule condition validations.

  • Admin
    Jim Luneke commented
    22 Sep 04:47pm

    Thank you for submitting this request. To date this has not been targeted as an enhancement that will be delivered in the near-term and as a result we are closing this request.

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.