Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling

This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Categories Other
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 4, 2021

BPN Rules levels with "Default with condition / Last preference with condition" option

We know the Default option in the BPN ST rules has the last preference when conditions are not matched. If we can have an extra option "Default with the condition" which works similarly to the "Default" option but it checks the condition. If still, it doesn't satisfy, then it goes to the Default rule if any.

What is your industry? Other
How will this idea be used?

By this we can create some rule more robust where there are no more options to use.

For example:
The Partner sends 3 types of files XML, CSV, & FLAT files via AS2 [AS2 Sender/ReceiverID conditions will be mandatory], where XML are send with .xml , CSV's are with .csv extension. However, the FLAT files are sent with no extension.

Now, to separate these files we need to use typing maps and separate the XML, CSV & Flat.

On the other hand, if I create a rule with file name ends with the condition it works work for XML and EDI but for Flat files, if we may end with a default rule then it will affect all the BPN_AS2_Receive_Rules.

Instead, if we have a "Default with condition" option I can enable it and validate the AS2 sender ID and Receiver ID condition as one step befroe the last preference [default rule].

Note: This is Just an example, But while implementing we see similar issues many more.

We can say this is because of the limited options that we have on the current rule condition validations.

  • Guest
    Sep 22, 2021

    Thank you for submitting this request. To date this has not been targeted as an enhancement that will be delivered in the near-term and as a result we are closing this request.