IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Submitted
Workspace Sterling Partner Engagement Manager
Categories Usability
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 6, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

PCM allows conflicting setups that override each other with no warning

PCM allows conflicting setups that override each other with no warning

For example on the typing side users can have 2 setups that both have the same sender, reciever, document type and when cm_coreprocess gets back the results from the typing service, the question is which dataflow to execute

Additionally within a specific dataflow setup, users could have an EDI setup:

sender CUSTOMER1 
reciever IBM 
document type 214

then add in the .+ regex both are valid setups

The ambiguity is which gets executed. The current behavior is the regex gets executed.

This RFE is to request PCM dev team to put out a warning to users - pointing out that a regular expression here will conflict with the EDI rule users have set up already.

Lack of warning to caution users of duplicate setup is a poor design. The RFE is to request PCM dev to address it.

<< This issue was reported in IBM case Portal: TS017015472>>

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.