This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Creating this RFE on request of IBM Development for RTC
1. Original Issue details
Description:
Customer is finding some orders with large numbers of Order Release Status records when one line is Reserved, and another continues in BackOrdered status, after multiple Schedule attempts. I have attached a replication steps document describing it.
Customer wants to use FIFO processing during schedule fulfillment, so they have set the Backordered retry schedule to be 0 hours, so we are seeing some orders have up to 30K - 50K ORS records due to one new one being added with each Schedule attempt. Client is expecting that new records shouldn't be created each time, so that the total number of ORS records won't build to such a volume and affect performance.
2. Simulation steps of problem
Attached are replication steps document describing it.
3. Resolution/workaround earlier provided
A Purge Script was provided in original case TS000799039 / RTC 576128
4. Expected behavior.
Customer is expecting solution that will ensure there are no duplicate records getting added.
What is your industry? | Wholesale Distribution & Services |
How will this idea be used?
Discussed in RTC 582375 |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Close this request since I have not heard back and based on my above comment, this should have already been delivered in a Fix Pack.
Hi Alexandar. I am reviewing old enhancement requests and this one appears to have been released in FP49 on version 9.4 and the issue was resolved. Could you please let me know if there is any outstanding aspect to this request?