Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling

This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on May 26, 2020

WorkOrder Purge effeciency

Observation in workOrder purge agent.
1) Multiple getsJobs are getting triggered with EnterpriseCode.
2) yfs_task_queue table doesn't have EnterpriseCode column, which leads to pick unnecessary records for executeJob (multiple enterprise scenario) and execution time increases.
3) No where clause for getsJobs for not picking same taskQ record.

Teams involved:

Nikhila Kurmala ( , Anusha Dasari(
What is your industry? Retail
How will this idea be used?

Performance of WorkOrder purge will be more efficient.

  • Guest
    Aug 17, 2020

    Thanks for specifying the existing behavior with this agent. I see that IBM Support and Engineering has provided alternate options to speed up the agent.

    Could you please outline what other design changes you were intending to raise as part of this RFE?

  • Guest
    May 26, 2020

    Reference cases #TS003382846 and #TS002371014

  • Guest
    May 26, 2020

    Note Case#TS002371014 // RTC#585658