IBM Sterling
This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Please provide an update. We were told by IBM support that we can close the PMR and all updates will be tracked here.
In one of the calls with IBM, this issue was discussed. IBM wanted to know if this change is needed in the scheduleOrder API. Right now, we do not need this change in scheduleOrder but in future we will need it (say + 6 months).i believe Vishal Arora was on that call and asked this question. He wanted to have AAP update the case with this response.
I created PMR when requested and waited for Support to schedule a call. Hopefully, it will happen this week. As for the multiple DG idea - that will not work. The issue is within a DG, we are trying to optimize the stops. We cannot easily evaluate by looking at the DG that there may or may not be a certain threshold of Stops. The OMS Multi-Stop Manager evaluates within the findInventory/sourcing API call.
Hi Salesh, Any updates on the discussions with support team?
Also, please validate the idea with additional sourcing options the OMS provides if local store does not have a stock. Ex. OMS allows to define multiple distribution groups and align them in the sequence of execution of sourcing rules to get item sourced from. Please work with support to understand the sourcing capabilities OMS provides.
thanks,
Bharat K
Yes, please create and follow up to get the feedback from support and engineering team on the case.
regards,
Bharat K
There is no support case/PMR. Do I need to create one? It was not a defect so one was not created.
Hi Salesh, please update the support case details to understand the feedback from engineering to weight this idea.
regards,
Bharat K