Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Planned for future release
Created by Guest
Created on May 12, 2023

ETS is skipping One Day when ETD is falling on Non-Working Day.

When Saturday and Sunday is non working day for store ,And Transfer Order is created on Wednesday(post cutoff) or Thursday(precutoff) from that store ,ETS of TO is skipping Thursday and it is showing on Friday ,even though Inventory and Capacity of transfer ship node is available on Thursday ,ETS of TO is showing on Friday .

As per PMR explanation,Currently OMS is calculating ETS as Thursday and ETS +52 hours which is falling on non working day ,Hence Moving ETD to next working day i.e Monday.

Corresponding Shifting ETS to Friday


 

In this scenario, Stores Capacity on Thursday is never utilized if it is use only for transfer.

Hence we want the Product is calculate ETS based on Inventory availability. And if ETD is falling in non working day Then only ETD should be moved to next working Day.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 21, 2024

    Thanks for the Update.

  • Admin
    Bharat Khade
    Reply
    |
    Mar 21, 2024

    Hi Aditya, Fix will be released on Apr 4th release. regards, Bharat K

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 21, 2024

    Hello Bharat,


    I am from Burberry dev team and we are trying to pick this up now as the March DTK upgrade has been completed. I am going through the release notes of the upgrade and i am not able to find anything related to this enhancement or the associated PMR.


    Could you confirm if this has been released as part of March Quarterly upgrade? If yes please let me know if i can go ahead with validation and required changes from our end to do so.


    Thanks,
    Aditya Baddula

  • Admin
    Bharat Khade
    Reply
    |
    Feb 26, 2024

    Hi Murali,

    Feature will be part of March quarter release. There is no special release for this fix.


    regards,

    Bharat K




  • Admin
    Bharat Khade
    Reply
    |
    Jan 30, 2024

    Hi Murali, Thanks for reaching. Thix fix will be released tentatively in March end.


    regards,

    Bharat K


  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 30, 2024

    Hi Bharat,

    Please let us know the tentative date in Q1 when this feature will be released?

    Thanks,

    Murali.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 17, 2024

    Hi ,


    Can you please let us know the tentative date in Q1 when this feature will be released


    Thanks,

    Priyanka

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 8, 2024

    Hi ,

    Please let us know the tentative date in Q1 when this feature will be released


    Thanks,

    Prajakta

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 8, 2024

    Hi Bharat,


    Please let us know the tentative date in Q1 when this feature will be released ?


    Thanks,

    Prajakta

  • Admin
    Bharat Khade
    Reply
    |
    Sep 4, 2023

    Hi Vijay,

    With a change in a plan and make implementation easier, IBM will release this feature only in the capacity of it's usage through UE. Mentioned UE will be enhanced to support customers to customize the feature for own use. Knowledge center will be updated for the usage. Tentative ETA is Q1-2024.

    Please share your priority to take this feature live and in case IBM can help in that regard. You can stay in touch witn IBM contact as before to get more details.


    Thanks,

  • Admin
    Bharat Khade
    Reply
    |
    Aug 22, 2023

    Solution for OH-I-113: Engineering team has tried reaching out to a consultant. Proposed solution document is shared with a consultant.
    1. We will provide a product enhancement to “override transit time calculation for procurement currently based on node transfer schedule” to “calculations based on Carrier Service Code returned from deliveryLeadTimeUE” during scheduleOrder or findInventory. Tentative ETA Q1-2024.
    2. Customer Implementation team will be required to implement the deliveryLeadTimeUE and provide valid carrier service code wherever applicable.

    3. For created transfer orders, specifying carrier service on order line will be sufficient.


  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 17, 2023

    Pls could we involve the client at various stages of design to ensure it meets their requirements?

  • Admin
    Bharat Khade
    Reply
    |
    Aug 17, 2023

    Tentative plan to release this feature is at the end of Q1 24.


  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 16, 2023

    Burberry want to know when IBM is taking this enhancement request like feature flag .could you share the tentative date .

  • Admin
    Bharat Khade
    Reply
    |
    Aug 16, 2023

    Hi Vijay, Please re-open existing support case or create a new support case to get a support from IBM team to implement UE based solution.


    thanks,

    Bharat K

  • Admin
    Bharat Khade
    Reply
    |
    Aug 10, 2023

    Hi Vijay,

    To continue the business, IBM will provide the alternative mechanism (UE based correction mechanism to introduce carrier service during PTO creation) and it is suggested to use it for current business scenario as well as other related business scenarios as applicable.

    IBM is taking this enhancement request for future consideration.


    thanks,

    Bharat K



  • Admin
    SHISHIR SAHA
    Reply
    |
    Jul 31, 2023

    We are considering a feature to drop the orders ASAP to the store/fulfillment location regardless of the customer request date. While the default behavior may not change, it is expected to have a feature flag which allows configurations to skip the system calculations for just-in-time fulfillment

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 6, 2023

    There is no transit hours in carrier service.It is only days.

    Could you please check transit time feature once more time.What is use of that feature it it will skip one day .It should handle by product .For Burberry There is no use of thursday Capacity .

    I request to re -consider that .

  • Admin
    SHISHIR SAHA
    Reply
    |
    Jun 5, 2023

    Hello,


    After reviewing this use case and the product behavior, we concluded that we the observed product behavior is the most optimal in terms of goods movement and saving capacity of the store for unexpected orders. This is for just-in-time fulfillment which reduces time in transit for shipments.


    To overcome the dates, you may choose to use changeOrderScheudle api to override dates on transfer orders. Alternately, you can also use an internal carrier service which considers deliveries on non-working days (essentially accounting for goods movements on non-working dates).

  • Admin
    SHISHIR SAHA
    Reply
    |
    May 23, 2023

    Thanks for logging this idea. I'm currently researching this.

    Similar ideas: OH-I-108, OH-I-109 and OH-I-113