This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
the usage of the CTX segment in the 999 would utilized in the LOOP ID - 2100 - AK2/IK3 ERROR IDENTIFICATION. where the Business Unit Identifier can correctly show the transaction error. TR3 rules state "Required when the error reported in this IK3 loop is within a business unit and the business unit identifier is known by the submitter of the 999" the TR3 also states how to utilize this within the 999
"Valid values for the business unit identifier are:
TRN02 269 business unit identifier
TRN02 270 business unit identifier
TRN02 271 business unit identifier
NM109 274 business unit identifier
PATIENT NAME NM109 275 business unit identifier
TRN02 276 business unit identifier
TRN02 277 business unit identifier
SUBSCRIBER NAME NM109 278 business unit identifier
ENT01 820 business unit identifier
SUBSCRIBER NUMBER REF02 834 business unit identifier
TRN02 835 business unit identifier
CLM01 837 business unit identifier"
What is your industry? | Insurance |
How will this idea be used?
The purpose of this is to identify the errors with the CTX segment in the 999 transaction. |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
We will review in the future, but not for the time horizon for thse requests. Please re-open in Q2 if still required.
We will re-evaluate. Many years ago I had reviewed this when we first implemented the 999 for version 5010 and the decision at that time was not to implement. The reason (if memory serves) was that due to uncorrolated arrays we would not always be certain that we could report the correct business unit value. I believe this was an issue in the 837s in particular - but it has been a while since I've look at this. Will ask a developer to review.
JIRA ITXP-8787
Will review internally
Will review internally
Is there a way to generate CTX Business Identifier Unit segment with IBM ITXA.
Thanks in adavance..