Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling

This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Functionality already exists
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 4, 2021

Support the use RACF PROTECTED userids in the Secure Point of Entry (SPOE)

When we create User IDs in RACF that will be used for Connect Direct transmissions, we have to create them with passwords so that the password can be used in the SPOE record. With a password is can make this User ID have the capability to signon. The password only needs to be known to RACF and the SPOE.

Should the User ID receive a password change in RACF, then every record for that User ID in SPOE has to be updated with the current password.

RACF has a attribute called PROTECTED which means it does not have a password and can not be used to Logon. Usage of PROTECTED IDs appears more secure since the User ID could not be used for any Logon purposes and no longer has a password.

Requesting that the product support the usage of RACF User IDs that are PROTECTED in SPOE.

What is your industry? Banking
How will this idea be used?

Many organizations do not want to assign permanent passwords to service accounts, due to the exposure of the password becoming known, and being used without knowledge. So organizations are switching to changing service account passwords on a routine basis.

If the RACF Password is changed then the password stored in SPOE has to change as well. The password change has to be coordinated to occur at nearly the same time to ensure there are no disruptions with data transmissions using the User ID/Service Account.

Creating the User ID/Service Account as PROTECTED removes the need for keeping the password in sync between RACF and SPOE.

  • Guest
    Feb 4, 2022

    Chris we tested with PROTECTD=AUTH, but we did not have any success.
    I did open a case with IBM on the issue: TS008326938

    Linnea G Sullivan Jr
    VP, Information Security Senior Engineer
    zSeries Security Strategy

    809 4 �� Street | Winston-Salem, NC 27101
    MAC D9635-010
    Tel 336-595-2831 | Cell 336-413-2080

    This transmission may contain information that is confidential and/or proprietary. If you are not the individual or entity to which it is addressed, note that any review, disclosure, copying, retransmission, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from your system. This transmission is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. Any information regarding specific investments or other products is not warranted for completeness or accuracy and is subject to change without notice.

  • Admin
    Chris Sanders
    Feb 1, 2022

    Thank you for opening this enhancement request with IBM. I have reviewed it with my team and we believe that this functionality actually already exists in C:D z/OS as part of the PROTECTD parameter. I've included a link below to that section of the documentation for details on that parameter. If you need guidance on using this parameter please open a case with support as my understanding is that it can be a bit tricky to use.

    Since we expect this to meet your needs I'm going to Decline this request. Please don't hesitate to use this tool to request other enhancements that you think we should consider.


    Chris Sanders

    Connect:Direct Product Manager