This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Thank you Sandeep for taking the time to provide your ideas to IBM. After internally exploring the RFE and considering the boarder market needs we would like to consider the below,
The Connect:Direct process language does not support using a symbolic variable for the process name. The example provided in the RFE is not expected to work: &PNAME PROCESS SNODE=CDNODE1
The designed way to overwrite the process name at submit time is through specifying the NEWNAME parameter on the SUBMIT PROCESS command. For example: SUBMIT FILE=MyProc1.cdp NEWNAME=MYPROC2;
Currently, this functionality cannot be configured in Integrated File Agent / Connect:Direct Webservices. To implement the requested functionality, both components would require code updates to let the user configure a process name overwrite at rule level.
please do not hesitate to reply to this message to continue the conversation. Appreciate your patience.
Thank you for taking the time to share your ideas to IBM. We truly value our relationship with you and appreciate your efforts and willingness to share details about your experience, your recommendations, and ideas. We will soon review the same in the coming weeks and shall get back with a response.
Thanks,
James
Please implement this update ASAP. The functionality is available on Linux and should also be available on Windows!