Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Planned for future release
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 12, 2025

Urgent Support Request – SharePoint Adopter Configuration

Hi Team,

I have successfully set up the connection to SharePoint using the IBM-provided SharePoint adopter, and it is functioning as expected—a highly effective solution.

However, the current configuration requires passing the site name within the adopter, which is essentially hardcoded. If I need to manage 100 site names, I would have to create 100 adopters, making it incredibly difficult to maintain. Instead, I would like to pass the site name dynamically using BP, allowing a single adopter to accommodate multiple partners.

I have raised IBM support tickets (TS019336167 and TS019319600), and their suggestion was to submit an Idea. This limitation is significantly impacting our workflow. Could you please review the issue and provide us with a viable solution at the earliest?

Looking forward to your prompt response.

Thanks

Ram.

What is your industry? Banking
How will this idea be used?

Idea aims to streamline the adopter configuration by allowing dynamic site name passing through BP instead of hardcoding it. If implemented, this would significantly reduce the number of adopters required, improving management efficiency and scalability

  • Admin
    Mark Allen
    Jul 16, 2025

    Thank you for taking the time to provide your ideas to IBM. Your request may not be delivered within the release currently under development, but the theme aligns with our current roadmap and your request is now a candidate for a future generally available (GA) release.


    If you have any additional feedback or thoughts in the meantime, or if there is anything else I can do, please do not hesitate to reply to this message to continue the conversation.


    Please note: IBM's statements regarding its plans, directions, and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice at IBM's sole discretion.