Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Functionality already exists
Categories Security
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 29, 2024

Only specific user should have access to specific BP Primary document and Instance Data

We have a business scenario, where for security reasons we want only allowed user(s) to have access to a specific BP flow execution. All users / superusers , who are not allowed to view this data, should not be able to view the Primary Document / Instance Data associated to this specific BP.

What is your industry? Healthcare
How will this idea be used?

As a security measure, we can restrict specific user to view only specific data.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 2, 2025

    Hi Mark,


    Thank you for your response. Actually the business scenario is that, we have a federal client so even within the superuser we have sub-categories of superuser's who should not view this federal data and its process flow execution in dashboard.

    So far my understanding is, there is no way we can have restrictions on the superuser account. If the user is a superuser then he will have the highest level of privilege. Users that should not view or access any federal data should not be granted superuser permissions.


    Thanks,

    Sheela

  • Admin
    Mark Allen
    Reply
    |
    Apr 2, 2025

    Hi Sheela,


    Our recommendation would be to remove permissions to the BP for those users who should not be able to view BPs, and they will lose the ability to execute the BPs as well.

    The super user role is generally reserved for those users who need access to everything. If there are users who should not view BPs, but are super users then they should not have the super user role assigned. You may want to consider granting these users multiple individual/granular permissions to just what they need instead of the full super user set. Another alternative is to create a group with the necessary multiple individual permissions and add users to that group.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 26, 2025

    Hi Mark,

    Yes, removing permissions to the BP will help. Also its ok if the user doesn't have execute permissions. I have a small doubt, even if the user is admin (super user) can we remove permissions for the admin account on that one specific BP ?

    Thanks,

    Sheela

  • Admin
    Mark Allen
    Reply
    |
    Feb 26, 2025

    Thank you for your reply. We have a few more questions to understand the broader use case:

    • If a user should not be able to see the BP history including if it's been executed or not, would removing the permission to the BP satisfy your requirement?

      • consequence of this would be to prevent the user from executing the BP - is this ok?


    I'm looking forward to your response. Once I can develop a clear picture of your request, I'll be able to let you know if we can add your idea to our future offering roadmap.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 12, 2025

    Hi Mark,


    Thank you for your response. The obscure service will encrypt the process data & primary document. But I am looking for a solution where user should not be allowed to view the business process execution itself.

    If we use the obscure service in the BPML, the data will be encrypted from the point the service is used. We will still be able to view the data in the process flow prior to obscure service call.

    The requirement is that the data (process + primary) should not be visible to the users (in the entire process flow), if they are not authorized to view.


    Thanks,

    Sheela


  • Admin
    Mark Allen
    Reply
    |
    Feb 12, 2025

    Thank you for taking the time to provide your ideas to IBM. I truly value our relationship with you and appreciate your willingness to share details about your experience, your recommendations and ideas.

    I need a little more information to understand your idea.

    We currently have a couple of services to help obscure sensitive data that could be added to your BP. Would this satisfy what you are looking for?

    I'm looking forward to your response. Once I can develop a clear picture of your request, I'll be able to let you know if we can add your idea to our future offering roadmap.