Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Feb 6, 2024

Need Corresponding Release of Vulnerabilities Fixed by Recently Released Patches/Fix Packs

There needs to be planned release(s) of known security vulnerabilities that are addressed in recent patches, i.e. 6.1.2.4 through regular channels (subscribed notifications). That seems to be how they've been released for IBM Sterling products in the past, but the information is a bit scattered over multiple bulletins sent out over time (usually a few weeks after release of the patch) based on subscribed notifications. Recently there was a list of 31 fixed vulnerabilities in fix pack release 6.1.2.4. That's great, and I completely understand that in a fix list not an appropriate place to list what these vulnerabilities are since it's public information, but the information needs to be published up to OpenCVE to correspond with the release of software so their scores are identified and customers of B2Bi/SFG can notify their security teams of what the vulnerabilities are that are addressed. DB2 as an example mostly does a pretty good job of this. Some customer/host sites run regular vulnerability scans, but it seems there isn't a way to reconcile against what vulnerability applications like QUALYS might come up with in their scans of B2Bi across its ports and access points without opening potentially a plethora of cases.

If there are vulnerabilities with a CVSS of 7 or above, I need to address those as high priority (for upgrade). Otherwise my B2Bi clusters/instances sit vulnerable until I find out one way or the other; either I'm hacked because I can't get the information I need even though I AM subscribed or I get lucky and exploits aren't used to harvest information, depending on the score assigned to each vulnerability and ability to exploit it. As we've all seen with the MOVEIt hack that reared its ugly head recently, I wouldn't want to see IBM's reputation suffer because customers couldn't get the vulnerability information and mitigate it with an existing fix pack.

Also I shouldn't be applying patches out of superstition. Informed decision making is always better. Since we manage many servers with IBM Sterling software on them, having this information available is critical to day-to-day operations and helps us prioritize builds and application of patches.

What is your industry? Computer Services
How will this idea be used?

Having this information available at the time of fix pack release enables us to mitigate vulnerabilities faster based on their score. It helps us determine if, for example, we should apply a fix pack or wait to go to next level of product. It's a critical component of our maintenance schedule for software.

  • Admin
    Mark Allen
    Reply
    |
    May 15, 2024

    Thank you for taking the time to provide your ideas to IBM. We truly value our relationship with you and appreciate your willingness to share details about your experience, your recommendations, and ideas.

    IBM has evaluated the request and has determined that it cannot be implemented at this time or does not align with our current strategy or roadmap.

    We adhere to IBM CISO's process, we are limited to what can be said and when. We cannot comment until a fix is available in every release available, hackers would check for unpatched older versions. Patches themselves could have 40+ fixes in every fixpack - an increasing number that makes it difficult to list in real-time and security is always evolving. We have a security section in release notes if it's been fixed across all solutions, otherwise we can't give details.


    Each release updates the CVE DB (internal to IBM), but we don't make it public, even to business partners - CoE would have to ask for specifics. CISO controls what gets updated publicly for CVSS scores etc. In order to stay current on security, patches will need to be applied on a regular basis as best practice.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 6, 2024

    these days security vulnerability is no doubt the top priority on every customer's mind. Nobody wants their PROD environment attached by hackers or their names show up on yet another mass data leak news. IBM the s/w vendor should make the security patching mechanism as easy as possible, and as early as possible for every customer and their consultants to plug the holes.