IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Store Engagement

Showing 74

Allow Pallet Receiving

The application currently supports receiving at the shipment level and container level, only leaving out pallet. The reason is not clear. Receiving should be allowed at all levels.
almost 2 years ago in Store Engagement / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Allow under receiving at qty level - Currently it shorts the entire container

Store engagement currently allows over receiving once you receive a container. I can over receive any quantity. But there is no provision to under receive. If I do record damage on a container, it records the entire container as damaged. If a case...
almost 2 years ago in Store Engagement / Usability 0 Future consideration

Transfers order created for Store to DC in Store UI should be stamping sequential Prime Line Number

While creating a transfer order for Store to a DC using Store Engagement UI, we have observed that the prime line numbers at the order line are getting stamped as 10,60 instead of the usual 1 and 2. This causes issue while sending order release de...
almost 2 years ago in Store Engagement / Usability 0 Future consideration

Apply / Resolve Holds feature missing in Store engagement

Costco is migrating their business from RCP SOM to Store Engagement. We are missing Apply / Resolve hold feature for an order - which is widely used by store associate today in case they want to enforce / bypass and proceed with the order processi...
about 2 years ago in Store Engagement / Usability 1 Functionality already exists

Supervisor Approval flow missing in Store engagement

At Costco, we have a usecase to support Supervisor approval workflow to override price in case the current user doesn't have relevant permissions. This feature is missing in Store engagement per current documention
about 2 years ago in Store Engagement / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Return Order Reciept in Store

Hi, One common return option with many retailers is Create Return Online(Self Service) or Create through Call Center and drop the item to store. For this scenario,once customer drops item to store - we need to receive the return order - record rec...
over 4 years ago in Store Engagement / Usability 0 Planned for future release

Store engagement UI: Streamline Reclassification of inventory across product classes

As a store operations associate I need the ability to quickly move inventory from one class to another. Currently IBM store requires an inventory adjustment out of the class with manual entry of the correct reason code and then and inventory adjus...
about 2 years ago in Store Engagement / Usability 0 Future consideration

Customer Pickup to pass Modification Reason when Cancel is selected and changeOrder is invoked

During Customer Pickup if "Cancel" is chosen as "More Actions" then cancellation reasons are provided in dropdown however when recordCustomerPick is invoked it internally calls changeOrder to cancel however the cancel reason code is not passed int...
over 2 years ago in Store Engagement / APIs & SDKs 1 Is a defect

TS009319697 : Not able to pick only specific order to SHIP in IBM store

In Store UI, if multiple shipments using same carrier, then we do not have the option to ship each shipment at different times. Replication steps attached. Client Requirement: We don’t want to send the store to store order out until we know the re...
over 2 years ago in Store Engagement / Other 1 Future consideration

Store UI: Requirement to capture user making inventory adjustments/cycle count approvals

In Store UI, when we perform inventory adjustments, user info who did the adjustment is not stored/displayed in store UI nor it is passed in the webhook inventory adjustment subscription. Impact: User will not be able to backtrack who performed in...
over 2 years ago in Store Engagement 0 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.