IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC)

Showing 202

Integrate parcel zones into promising depth

When promising, some customers don't want to go beyond a general "next day" parcel concept. While it's possible to add carriers and use those in promising, our customers don't need that level of accuracy. Rather, they look at something like UPS's ...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 1 Future consideration

Let us decide if YFS_INVENTORY_ITEM "select for update" will be used during API calls

For many models, a "select for update" is essential. In our case, our items are tightly controlled, so we do not expect to need to create inventory item records that can then be promised or ordered. We would like to have the choice in findInventor...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 2 Not under consideration

findInventory API does not allow to bypass inventory of shipnode passed in the input in case inventory transfer to be peformed forcefully

Hi, Now a days, we are getting requirements to implement scenarios to transfer the inventory from one node to the ship or pickup node though there is a inventory available in ship node. These are the route to store scenarios for most of the clien...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 3 Future consideration

Support Alternate UOM for the item pricing and promotion

Typically alternate uoms have a different pricing than the primary uom. The application currently allows to define pricing and promotions based on primary uom only. I believe the application uses primary uom to identify the item but that should no...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 0 Future consideration

Provide a way to truncate master data tables similar to how transaction data is truncated via self-serve.

Similar to the "Reset Transaction Db" process on self-serve for OMoC there should also be a reset master data which would include all of the tables classified as MASTER or MASTER and TRANSACTION such as the YFS_ITEM table. There are times when it ...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 1 Not under consideration

Inventory demand and Supply entries should not be made to additional tables for Non Hot items after enabling hot sku

It is not acceptable to have record put into the additional tables for items that are not hot. We are this behaviour after enabling the Hotsku feature in 9.3. All the items are marked as having infinite inventory but the demand is being synced w...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 1 Not under consideration

Implement 'Hold' for a bulk product order for up to 30mins (or XX mins) as per OMoC SF ticket TS002131182

Add following functionality for 'On Hold' bulk items up to XX mins. As per following scenario ... We have created a remorse hold, to hold order's for 30 mins. To resolve the hold, we have created hold processing agent which is abstract transaction...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 0 Future consideration

Enable purging data from transaction tables directly, instead of first purging to history

We currently have userexit purgeOrderToExternalDataStoreUE for purgeOrder. This was provided by IBM on our request. We are using this currently in production. This only covers orders and its related entities, but not shipments, receipts, work orde...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 0 Future consideration

Ref Case #:TS001675506, ETS and EAD not getting updated for pickup Orders (Chained Orders) when there is change in PO ETA

Whenever there is change in PO ETA, For Pickup Orders Orders (Chained Orders) ETS, EAD are not updated correctly. More details can be found at case#: TS001675506 Link: https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/case/5000z00001H8r3pAAB/ets-not-getting-upda...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 1 Future consideration

Ability to define picking capacity at order line level

This is copied over from: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=59894 What is the requested functionality Picking capacity* is maintained for each fulfilment unit (STO, CDC,CPU etc) on Order Line level. T...
almost 5 years ago in OMS - Order Management (OnPrem & OMoC) 1 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.