Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
IBM is transforming its request for enhancement (RFE) process. The purpose of the transformation is to provide a more consistent experience for you to submit requests and to enable IBM product owners to respond to your requests more quickly. For more information click here.
Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
1. Post an idea
2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you
3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive notifications on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
-
Need ability to specify the Node for which the Inventory Activity records should be created
Request to keep the createInventoryActivity API or add the feature of adding the Inventory activities for the given store automatically.
-
getOrderList API should provide one unioned, sorted result set across active and history records
Today's implementation of getOrderList API makes two calls under the hood - one to archive tables and one to active tables (assuming archive switch was invoked in the call.)Almost *no* consumer of order history wants two separate lists, each sorte...
-
Enhance REST service functionality to accept additional content types.
Vendors such as Adyen have the Content-Type as "application/json; charset=utf-8" rather than the standard application/json content type. The request is to enhance the OMS webservice functionality to accept content types that include the character ...
-
Maintain item search details and context over the different selections in BUC
It would help productivity in BUC if the item search feature remembered the selections previously made. There is the breadcrumb offering some persistence, but if the user jumps to Orders or anywhere else, all the item search selections are cleared...
-
To consider unassigned demands at all the DGs configured in the common code.
When an unassigned demand is created, RTAM publishes availability only to the DG which has a priority set in the common code while other DG's are updated with X onHand quantity and doesn't consider the unassigned demand.By considering unassigned d...
-
RTAM - Cannot run RTAM in multi threaded mode
Refer this PMR - https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/case/5000z00001FdfZAAAZ/service-to-execute-on-completion-of-work-in-agent-runtime-properties-does-not-work-in-multi-threaded-mode
Let me consider a scenario here
Total Records - 13000
Max Reco...
-
Search by multiple order types simultaneously
Need an ability to search by multiple orders simultaneously. Currently its only allowed to search by a single order type ( Sales order or transfer order, etc )
-
An option to extract/export search results
For all search results available in OrderHub ( Orders, orderlines items, shipments, releases ) , an option to download in a csv form will be useful
-
RTAM - Inventory Alerts - Save Suppy, Demand & Safety Stock inventory positions
As part of inventory publish, few systems are interested in ATP (supply - demand - safety stock), few other systems are in only (supply - demand) and few others are interested in only onhand supply. However, RTAM publishes only ATP and to calculat...
-
Java 64 bit implementation for Application Manager
In my team, everybody having Java 32 bit even I also downgraded to 32 bit which can support 9.5 Console-> Configuration -> Launch Application Manager. We seen that if we use 64 bit, then Application Manager we not able to Launch.Once we move...
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
1
Needs more information