Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
IBM is transforming its request for enhancement (RFE) process. The purpose of the transformation is to provide a more consistent experience for you to submit requests and to enable IBM product owners to respond to your requests more quickly. For more information click here.
Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
1. Post an idea
2. Upvote ideas that matter most to you
3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive notifications on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
Upgrade/Fix Installation should log and recreate the custom Database Indexes dropped during the installation
As per the current design , Fix installation drops all the Custom Indexes created on Database and recreates the Database schema without the custom indexes dropped.
Customers will be having lot many custom changes (Custom Indexes) done on Data...
Support for TLS V1.3 for B2BAC trading partner connections
The governance body across the Superannuation Transaction Network (STN) is maturing its security posture. As such they are looking to mandate TLS V1.3 connection in the future.
Password stretching use appropriate ASD approved algorithm for B2Bi
A recent audit under the Gateway Network Governance Body - Information Security Requirements has identified that B2BI is not compliance is ASD ISM control 1402 - Security Control: 1402; Revision: 5; Updated: Aug-20; Applicability: O, P, S, TS Stor...
Support for TLS encryption to four MEIG databases
Precision Administration is an approved Gateway Operator. Consequently we are bound by the security requirements of our governance body - the GNGB - https://www.gngb.com.au/ The GNGB published their Information Security Requirements which includes...
Enable FASP support via SSP Perimeter Servers
We recently learnt via a support ticket (as this is currently undocumented at the time of writing) that SSP is unable to route the UDP traffic used by C:D's High-Speed Add-On FASP through SSP Perimeter Servers. This severely limits the scenarios w...
Adapter Containers: Allow container-specific JVM arguments
Right now, if you want to add custom JVM arguments to adapter containers (say for JVM monitoring), this is done via the Performance Tuning wizard. The wizard provides only one field for custom JVM arguments, which are then applied to all adapter c...
Add Release notes for 6.X in the format of 5.X
The Link - https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SS3JSW_5.2.0/nav_container_topics/sub_overview_release_notes.html used to provide complete details on what is changing in the version but for 6.X there is no update as such. This will help ...
Update the EBICS HAC schema to comply with standard
the xml schema used in EBICS HAC is ISO20022 pain.002.001.05 when it should be pain.002.001.03 according to the 2.5 version of the standard. Even more, in version 3.0 is not updated to .05 and still remains .03 (need to be doubled checked though)
Looping RC validation check
We have encountered this problem many times, there is no precheck in SFG that will check for loops before deploying the routing channel.
Due to this problem, we have ran into huge recursive file routing loops which kept reprocessing the same ...
In EBICS Client, ability to get both EBICS T and EBICS TS on a same FileFormat (SEPA SCT) with one Bank
In EBICS Client the offer definition doesn't allow to have different level of signature for one file format with a bank. This enhancement request is to have the offer at the Partner ID Level, and not at the bankID Level which is too restrictive in...
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.